Food Law Blog
Opinions and insights from our Food and Drink team
Search site
Contact our offices
Make an enquiry
Food Law Blog
Opinions and insights from our Food and Drink team
The robotics industry is one of rapid growth and innovation within the food sector. The benefits for productivity, health and safety and profit increase are definitely appealing, but it’s crucial that food businesses do not ‘run before they can walk’ when it comes to implementation.
As tedious as it can be, carrying out tests with prototypes before investing vast sums of money will pay off in the long run. Carry out a small-scale prototype project to prove concept and pay-back before undertaking the larger project and assess your potential ROI (return on investment) before pitching to your board.
Remember that any testing programme should include post-installation performance testing to prove in-operation reliability (uptime) of installed plant.
Ask yourself, ‘where are we losing money?’, ‘which areas of the manufacturing process present the most risks?’ and ‘how can we be more productive?’ There is very little point adding robotics into an area which is already performing at optimum levels - go for the low-hanging fruit and automate in areas where there is a large, low-skill labour-saving to be had with repetitive tasks such as weighing ingredients by hand.
Don’t get left in the lurch and blinded by cheap prices. Remember - you always get what you pay for, so use an experienced supplier with strength both financially and with in-depth resources for installation and post-installation support. Unless you are an experienced operator, contract on a turn-key basis with a supplier capable of handling projects of the scale envisaged. You should require the supplier to undertake computer model simulation of the proposed solution where the interactions are complex.
Know which of your products are to be handled and be realistic in what you aim to achieve. Automation is generally much less flexible than manual operations and not as capable of reacting to last minute changes. Set down the key deliverables in written form in an “Employer’s Requirements” document.
Be realistic with timescales – leave time for extensive testing and “sea trials” as well as growth in experience of the operational team. Under-promise and over-deliver to the business.
Ensure your operational team has the right skill-mix – operating automation requires a calm and analytical approach to spot issues and address them as they arise. Shouting at a robot or software engineers seldom helps. Bring experienced operational staff (or consultants) into key positions both for the planning/installation period and for long-term operation.
Above all make sure you instruct an experienced lawyer who will take the robotic weight off your shoulders! Get in touch with martinjinks@roythornes.co.uk should you have any questions regarding this article or the legal aspects of robotics.
Clicking the Accept All button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies (check the full list). We use cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click Settings.
Our use of cookies.
You can learn more detailed information in our Privacy Policy
Some cookies are essential, whilst others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. The technology to maintain this privacy management relies on cookie identifiers. Removing or resetting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.
Essential Cookies
These cookies enable core website functionality, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
Google Analytics cookies help us to understand your experience of the website and do not store any personal data. Click here for a full list of Google Analytics cookies used on this site.
Third-Party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on this site.
Comments