Agri Blog
Opinions and insights from Roythornes' agriculture team
Search site
Contact our offices
Make an enquiry
Agri Blog
Opinions and insights from Roythornes' agriculture team
Consider the case of MB v EB.
The parties separated in 2004 after only three or four years of marriage.
In 2011 they agreed a separation agreement where the husband, a struggling artist, received £245,000, from his wife, to purchase a property and an additional lump sum of £35,000.
Both parties had legal advice and the agreement was intended to be in full and final settlement of all claims between them that would subsequently have to be finalised whenever a future divorce was filed. Divorce proceedings were delayed until they were eventually issued in 2017 and, again, in 2019.
The husband then pursued additional financial claims against his wife and has succeeded, despite the agreement. The court has now awarded him an additional £325,000 - a one-off payment to provide for his living expenses at £25,000 per annum for the rest of his life expectancy. He also received an extra £10,000 for a car. The wife, a multi-millionaire with a wealth of “not less than £50m”, had argued that there should be no additional claim. She would have argued that both parties knew what they were agreeing back in 2011 and that both parties had solicitors at the time.
The judgment records that she had argued that parties are free to make agreements between themselves and that they should be entitled to rely upon those agreements as they move forward with their lives after the relationship has ended.
For all of that, the court has ordered that the wife will have to pay more money to her husband. The court can do this because financial agreements between divorcing couples are never fully binding until they have been approved and sealed by the court.
In many cases this happens when a properly drafted consent order is filed at court, together with a summary of the parties’ relevant financial circumstances. A judge then considers the documents and if she or he feels the agreement is appropriate, will approve and seal the order. The court is not able to consider consent orders until the decree nisi has been made.
Where an agreement is reached before the parties get divorced then there is always the risk that it could be varied at a later date. That risk is reduced if both parties had legal advice and full knowledge of each other’s financial circumstances and in the absence of coercion or fraud. All of those safeguards were presumably present in this current case.
So how was the husband able to succeed in his claim?
In summary, the judge provided six reasons.
Neil Denny, Nottingham-based divorce lawyer with Roythornes Solicitors, explains that not every separation agreement is now up for renegotiation.
“The judgment does reinforce the warning, however, that the only truly, final and binding financial arrangement between a divorcing couple is a sealed financial order – whether one reached by consent or one imposed by the court.”
If you are thinking about, or going through, separation and divorce, or know somebody who is, then get in touch to explore how this impacts your arrangements. You can call one of our experienced family law solicitors in Spalding on 01775 842505 or in Nottingham on 0115 9454425
Clicking the Accept All button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies (check the full list). We use cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click Settings.
Our use of cookies.
You can learn more detailed information in our Privacy Policy
Some cookies are essential, whilst others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. The technology to maintain this privacy management relies on cookie identifiers. Removing or resetting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.
Essential Cookies
These cookies enable core website functionality, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
Google Analytics cookies help us to understand your experience of the website and do not store any personal data. Click here for a full list of Google Analytics cookies used on this site.
Third-Party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on this site.
Comments