Food Law Blog
Opinions and insights from Roythornes' Food and Drink team
Search site
Contact our offices
Make an enquiry
Food Law Blog
Opinions and insights from Roythornes' Food and Drink team
As a food business you would be wise to invest in protecting your key designs – particularly after the courts rejected a plea by Kit Kat to trademark their legendary four-fingered shape.
The well reported case involved Cadbury, who challenged an application by Kit Kat owners, Nestle, to protect the four fingered design in order to prevent copycat products. The issue has been ongoing since 2014, however, Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the High Court, finally ruled in favour of Cadbury on Wednesday, 27 January 2016. Nestle had argued that even without its red and white packaging or the word KitKat embossed on the chocolate, the shape of the bar should be regarded as distinct.
I t is understood Nestle now plan to appeal but, in light the ruling, it is a timely reminder of the need for companies to protect their assets at as an early a stage as possible.
While this decision will be incredibly frustrating for Nestle, given the size of the company, it may not be the end of the world. However, for smaller companies a decision like this could be a huge blow.
It demonstrates just how vital it is to ensure all elements of a company’s intellectual property are protected so far as possible. Protecting the shape of a three dimensional object can sometimes be much trickier than protecting a more obvious facet of a product's identity, such as a logo.
A business will often have more difficulty getting a trademark granted in respect of a three dimensional object, perhaps because their features are often seen as technical function rather than distinctive traits that ought to be protected.
I n addition, the courts have repeatedly been reluctant to grant one party protection at the risk of excluding others from the market. There will always be a balancing act between protecting new, inventive and distinct models and granting one company a monopoly over the market.
Nestle will now be in the position of ensuring that other elements of their products are protected in other ways, to try to limit the level of copycat products that can be produced.
It sends a message to all food producers to invest in brand protection as in a competitive world there is always someone looking for opportunities.
Clicking the Accept All button means you are accepting analytics and third-party cookies (check the full list). We use cookies to optimise site functionality and give you the best possible experience. To control which cookies are set, click Settings.
Our use of cookies.
You can learn more detailed information in our Privacy Policy
Some cookies are essential, whilst others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. The technology to maintain this privacy management relies on cookie identifiers. Removing or resetting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.
Essential Cookies
These cookies enable core website functionality, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
Google Analytics cookies help us to understand your experience of the website and do not store any personal data. Click here for a full list of Google Analytics cookies used on this site.
Third-Party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on this site.
Comments